Join fans of the beloved writer Betty MacDonald (1907-58). Nancy and Plum Fan Club. A Fan Club and literary Society. Betty MacDonald, the author of The egg and I and Nancy and Plum is beloved all over the world. Don't miss Betty MacDonald biography and the very funny and witty interviews on CD and DVD!
Monday, February 6, 2017
Nancy and Plum, Betty MacDonald, Hollywood and travel ban
Hello 'Pussy' this is Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle:
Judge
Robart’s order allowed people from the seven countries who had been
authorized to travel, along with vetted refugees from all nations, to
enter the country.
Do you have any idea why they feel so ashamed? I do!
Should I remain in bed, leave my country or fight against the dragon?
( see also the story by Wolfgang Hampel, ' Betty MacDonald: Nothing more to say ' )
Betty and Don MacDonald in Hollywood
Betty MacDonald's mother Sydney with grandchild Alison Beck
Wolfgang Hampel and Betty MacDonald fan club research team are working on an updated Betty MacDonald biography.
This
very new Betty MacDonald biography includes all the results we got
during a very successful Betty MacDonald fan club research which started
in 1983.
You'll be able to find unique Betty MacDonald treasures in our Betty MacDonald biography.
Betty MacDonald biography includes for example interviews with Betty MacDonald, her family and friends.
We got many letters by Betty MacDonald and other family members even very important original ones.
Our
goal is to publish a Betty MacDonald biography that shows all the
details of Betty MacDonald's life and work but also to present her
fascinating siblings.
Dear Betty MacDonald fan club fans let us know please what you are interested most in a future Betty MacDonald biography.
Our next Betty MacDonald fan club project is a collection of these unique dedications.
If you
share your dedication from your Betty MacDonald - and Mary Bard Jensen
collection you might be the winner of our new Betty MacDonald fan club
items.
Thank you so much in advance for your support.
Thank you so much for sending us your favourite Betty MacDonald quote.
Thank you so much for sharing this witty memories with us.
Wolfgang Hampel's literary event Vita Magica
is very fascinating because he is going to include Betty MacDonald,
other members of the Bard family and Betty MacDonald fan club honor
members.
I agree with Betty in this very witty Betty MacDonald story Betty MacDonald: Nothing more to say by Wolfgang Hampel.
I
can't imagine to live in a country with him as so-called elected
President although there are very good reasons to remain there to fight
against these brainless politics.
WASHINGTON — A fast-moving legal fight over President Trump’s targeted travel ban
reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in
San Francisco, late Saturday. Here is a look at where things stand.
What does the Trump administration want?
Lawyers for the federal government asked the appeals court to stay a temporary restraining order
issued Friday by Judge James Robart of the Federal District Court in
Seattle. Judge Robart was appointed by President George W. Bush.
Fact Check: Trump’s Immigration Order
President Trump blocked travel from
seven Muslim-majority countries, and cut refugee admissions by more than
half. We checked the facts.
Don't miss these very interesting articles below, please.
Lately,
it appears Trump has gone back into the field to drag in a whole new
bunch of State contenders.
My favorite is Representative Dana
Rohrabacher of California, a person you have probably never heard of
even though he’s been in Congress since the 1980s and is currently head
of the prestigious Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia and Emerging Threats.
I think the future dinosaur flatulence will be the behaviour of 'Pussy' and his very strange government.
Poor World! Poor America!
Don't miss these very interesting articles below, please.
The most difficult case in Mrs.Piggle-Wiggle's career
Hello 'Pussy', this is Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle.
You
took calls from foreign leaders on unsecured phone lines, without
consultung the State Department. We have to change your silly behaviour
with a new Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle cure. I know you are the most difficult
case in my career - but we have to try everything.......................
Betty MacDonald was sitting on her egg-shaped cloud and listened to a rather strange guy.
He said to his friends: So sorry to keep you waiting. Very complicated business! Very complicated!
Betty said: Obviously much too complicated for you old toupee!
Besides him ( by the way the First Lady's place ) his 10 year old son was bored to death and listened to this 'exciting' victory speech.
The old man could be his great-grandfather.
The
boy was very tired and thought: I don't know what this old guy is
talking about. Come on and finish it, please. I'd like to go to bed. Dear 'great-grandfather' continued and praised the Democratic candidate.
He always called her the most corrupt person ever and repeated it over and over again in the fashion of a Tibetan prayer wheel.
She is so corrupt. She is so corrupt. Do you know how corrupt she is?
Betty MacDonald couldn't believe it when he said: She
has worked very long and very hard over a long period of time, and we
owe her a major debt of gratitude for her service to our country.
Afterwards old toupee praised his parents, wife, children, siblings and friends.
He asked the same question like a parrot all the time: Where are you? Where are you? Where are you? I know you are here!
Betty MacDonald answered: No Pussy they are not! They left the country.
They immigrated to Canada
because they are very much afraid of the future in the U.S.A. with you
as their leader like the majority of all so-called more or less normal
citizens.
This
is incredible! I'll You get what you pay/vote for and Trump is the
epitome of this ideology. America I won't feel bad for you because you
don't need my sympathy for what's coming but I am genuinely scared for
you. 'Forgive them lord for they know not who they do' or maybe they do
but just don't care about their future generations who will suffer for
this long after the culprits have passed away.
Wise guy, North Pole, Svalbard And Jan Mayen, 9 minutes ago
Is the USA like North Korea where you can't trust other politicians?
That's it.
Put Ivanka in! Put Ivanka in! Put my whole family and friends in! ' What about Putin?
Or the leaders from China and North Korea?
Wouldn't it be a great idea to put them in too?
What about very intelligent and qualified Sarah Palin?
In 2006, Palin obtained a passport[88] and in 2007 traveled for the first time outside of North America on a trip to Kuwait. There she visited the Khabari Alawazem Crossing at the Kuwait–Iraq border and met with members of the Alaska National Guard at several bases.[89] On her return journey she visited injured soldiers in Germany.[90] That's the reason why very intelligent and brilliant Sarah Palin knows the World very well. Sarah and ' Pussygate ' will rule America and the World - what a couple.
Wolfgang
Hampel's Betty MacDonald and Ma and Pa Kettle biography and Betty
MacDonald interviews have fans in 40 countries. I'm one of their many devoted fans.
Many Betty MacDonald - and Wolfgang Hampel fans are very interested in a Wolfgang Hampel CD and DVD with his
very funny poems and stories.
We are going to publish new Betty MacDonald essays on Betty MacDonald's gardens and nature in Washington State. Tell us the names of this mysterious couple please and you can win a very new Betty MacDonald documentary.
The series premiered on September 3,
1951, the same day as "Search for Tomorrow," and ended on August 1,
1952.
Although it did well in the ratings, it had difficulty
attracting a steady sponsor. This episode features Betty Lynn (later
known for her work on "The Andy Griffith Show") as Betty MacDonald, John
Craven as Bob MacDonald, Doris Rich as Ma Kettle, and Frank Twedell as
Pa Kettle.
Betty MacDonald fan club exhibition will be fascinating with the international book editions and letters by Betty MacDonald. I can't wait to see the new Betty MacDonald documentary.
An Iraqi family from Woodbridge, Va., welcomed their grandmother at Dulles International Airport on Sunday.Credit
Astrid Riecken/European Pressphoto Agency
WASHINGTON — A fast-moving legal fight over President Trump’s targeted travel ban
reached the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in
San Francisco, late Saturday. Here is a look at where things stand.
What does the Trump administration want?
Lawyers for the federal government asked the appeals court to stay a temporary restraining order
issued Friday by Judge James Robart of the Federal District Court in
Seattle. Judge Robart was appointed by President George W. Bush.
Fact Check: Trump’s Immigration Order
President Trump blocked travel from
seven Muslim-majority countries, and cut refugee admissions by more than
half. We checked the facts.
By DAVE HORN, MEG FELLING and DAPHNE RUSTOW on
Publish Date February 3, 2017.
Photo by Al Drago/The New York Times.
Watch in Times Video »
Acting
on a request from two states, Washington and Minnesota, Judge Robart
temporarily banned the administration from enforcing two parts of Mr.
Trump’s order: its 90-day suspension of entry into the United States of
people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and its
limits on accepting refugees, including “any action that prioritizes the
refugee claims of certain religious minorities.”
Judge
Robart’s order allowed people from the seven countries who had been
authorized to travel, along with vetted refugees from all nations, to
enter the country.
What does the administration argue?
In its brief,
the administration said that Judge Robart had “improperly
second-guessed the president’s national security determinations.” The
brief said the president had vast power over immigration under the
Constitution and federal law.
Get the Morning Briefing by Email
What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.
The court declined to issue an immediate administrative stay,
but it said it would consider the federal government’s emergency motion
for a stay after receiving more briefs. The court set a very fast
briefing schedule, asking the states to respond by midnight Sunday
Pacific time, with the federal government to file a second brief by 3
p.m. on Monday.
How fast will the appeals court act?
There is every indication that the court will act promptly.
Who are the appeals court judges?
The
appeals court’s order was issued by Judge William C. Canby Jr., who was
appointed by President Jimmy Carter, and Judge Michelle T. Friedland,
who was appointed by President Barack Obama. They are two of the three
Ninth Circuit judges designated to hear motions in February. The third, Judge Richard R. Clifton, was appointed by President George W. Bush.
Will the appeals court hear oral arguments?
Motions for stays are typically decided based on paper filings.
Will the case reach the Supreme Court?
Almost certainly. The losing side will very likely ask the justices to review the appeals court’s ruling on the emergency stay.
The
ultimate decision on whether the executive order is lawful will not
come quickly. That means people seeking to travel or settle here may be
whipsawed until the case is finally resolved.
A version of this article appears in print on February 6, 2017, on Page A10 of the New York edition with the headline: A Look at Where the Case Stands. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe
Homeland Security suspends actions associated with Trump's travel ban; 'standard policy' now in effect
Reuters with CNBC
Brian Snyder | Reuters
Behnam Partopour, a Worcester Polytechnic
Institute (WPI) student from Iran, is greeted by friends at Logan
Airport after he cleared U.S. customs and immigration on an F1 student
visa in Boston, Massachusetts. Partopour was originally turned away from
a flight to the U.S. following President Donald Trump's executive order
travel ban.
A Seattle federal judge on Friday put a nationwide block on U.S. President Donald Trump's
week-old executive order that had temporarily barred refugees and
nationals from seven countries from entering the United States. The judge's temporary
restraining order represents a major setback for Trump's action, though
the White House said late Friday that it believed the ban to be "lawful
and appropriate" and that the U.S. Department of Justice would file an
emergency appeal. As a result of the
ruling, the Department of Homeland Security suspended its enforcement of
the ban, announcing on Saturday that "standard policy and procedures"
were now in effect. "In accordance with the
judge's ruling, DHS has suspended any and all actions implementing the
affected sections of the Executive Order entitled, "Protecting the
Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States," DHS said in
a statement. "DHS personnel will
resume inspection of travelers in accordance with standard policy and
procedure," it stated, adding that the Justice Department would file an
emergency stay to "defend the president's executive order, which is
lawful and appropriate." The move came on the
heels of the State Department announcing it was reversing the revocation
of visas that left countless travelers stranded at airports last
weekend. "Those individuals with
visas that were not physically cancelled may now travel if the visa is
otherwise valid," the department said in a statement. Early Saturday morning,
Trump criticised the ruling as "ridiculous" and warned of big trouble
if a country could not control its borders. Still, just hours after
the ruling, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told airlines they could
board travelers who had been affected by the ban. Trump's Jan. 27 order
caused chaos at airports across the United States last week as some
citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen were
denied entry. Virtually all refugees were also barred, upending the
lives of thousands of people who had spent years seeking asylum in the U.S. The State Department
said Friday that almost 60,000 visas were suspended in the wake of
Trump's order; it was not clear Friday night whether that suspension was
automatically revoked or what travelers with such visas might confront
at U.S. airports. While a number of
lawsuits have been filed over Trump's action, the Washington state
lawsuit was the first to test the broad constitutionality of the
executive order. Judge James Robart, a George W. Bush appointee,
explicitly made his ruling apply across the country, while other judges
facing similar cases have so far issued orders concerning only specific
individuals. The challenge in
Seattle was brought by the state of Washington and later joined by the
state of Minnesota. The judge ruled that the states have legal standing
to sue, which could help Democratic attorneys general take on Trump in
court on issues beyond immigration. Washington's case was
based on claims that the state had suffered harm from the travel ban,
for example students and faculty at state-funded universities being
stranded overseas. Amazon.com and Expedia, both based in Washington state, had supported the lawsuit, asserting that the travel restrictions harmed their businesses. Tech companies, which
rely on talent from around the world, have been increasingly outspoken
in their opposition to the Trump administration's anti-immigrant
policies. Judge Robart probed a
Justice Department lawyer on what he called the "litany of harms"
suffered by Washington state's universities, and also questioned the
administration's use of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States
as a justification for the ban. Robart said no attacks
had been carried out on U.S. soil by individuals from the seven
countries affected by the travel ban since that assault. For Trump's
order to be constitutional, Robart said, it had to be "based in fact, as
opposed to fiction."
Outrageous order
The White House said it would file an appeal as soon as possible. "At the earliest
possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file an emergency
stay of this outrageous order and defend the executive order of the
president, which we believe is lawful and appropriate," the White House
said in a statement. "The president's order
is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional
authority and responsibility to protect the American people." Washington Governor Jay
Inslee celebrated the decision as a victory for the state, adding: "No
person - not even the president - is above the law." The judge's decision was welcomed by groups protesting the ban. "This order
demonstrates that federal judges throughout the country are seeing the
serious constitutional problems with this order," said Nicholas
Espiritu, a staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center. Eric Ferrero, Amnesty
International USA spokesman, lauded the short-term relief provided by
the order but added: "Congress must step in and block this unlawful ban
for good." But the fluid legal
situation was illustrated by the fact that Robart's ruling came just
hours after a federal judge in Boston declined to extend a temporary
restraining order allowing some immigrants into the United States from
countries affected by Trump's three-month ban. A Reuters poll earlier
this week indicated that the immigration ban has popular support, with
49 percent of Americans agreeing with the order and 41 percent
disagreeing. Some 53 percent of Democrats said they "strongly disagree"
with Trump's action while 51 percent of Republicans said they "strongly
agree." At least one company, the ride-hailing giant Uber, was moving quickly Friday night to take advantage of the ruling. CEO Travis Kalanick,
who quit Trump's business advisory council this week in the face of a
fierce backlash from Uber customers and the company's many immigrant
drivers, said on Twitter: "We have a team of in-house attorneys who've
been working night & day to get U.S. resident drivers & stranded
families back into country. "I just chatted with
our head of litigation Angela, who's buying a whole bunch of airline
tickets ASAP!! #homecoming #fingerscrossed"
Four states in court
The decision in Washington state came at
the end of a day of furious legal activity around the country over the
immigration ban. The Trump administration has justified its actions on
national security grounds, but opponents have labeled it an
unconstitutional order targeting people based on religious beliefs. In Boston, U.S.
District Judge Nathan Gorton expressed skepticism during oral arguments
about a civil rights group's claim that Trump's order represented
religious discrimination, before declining to extend the restraining
order. U.S. District Judge
Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, ordered the federal government
to give the state a list by Thursday of "all persons who have been
denied entry to or removed from the United States." The state of Hawaii on
Friday also filed a lawsuit alleging that the order is unconstitutional
and asking the court to block the order across the country. Phillip Tutt contributed to this article.
Donald Trump 'blasted' Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull over 'dumb' refugee deal in heated phone call - Thursday morning briefing
Donald Trump and Malcolm TurnbullCredit:
Rex/Getty
Donald Trump blasted Malcolm Turnbull over a "dumb" refugee swap deal
during a tense phone call, it has emerged, as the Australian Prime
Minister was forced to deny that the US president slammed the phone down
on him. During a phone conversation on Saturday, Mr Trump reportedly told his
Australian counterpart that he had spoken with four other world leaders
that day and that “This was the worst call by far.”
The president, who reportedly
blasted the Australian leader over a deal agreed with the Obama
administration for the US to resettle some of the refugees held in
remote Pacific island camps, abruptly ended Saturday's call, which was
expected to last an hour, after just 25 minutes.
Paid content
That
would be far shorter than the earlier calls with Shinzo Abe of Japan,
Angela Merkel of Germany, François Hollande of France or Vladimir Putin,
the Russian president. Australian government officials, who said the Washington Post's
account of the call was "substantially accurate", described the
conversation as "robust" and admitted it was "shorter than expected",
ABC News reported. Mr Turnbull denied that Mr Trump hung up the phone. "The call ended courteously, that's all I want to say about that," he told Melbourne radio station 3AW.
Mr
Turnbull was trying to confirm that Mr Trump would honour a deal made
with the Obama administration to take in 1,250 refugees from an
Australian detention centre. “This is the worst deal ever,” Mr Trump said, according to the Washington Post.
Mr Trump complained he was “going to get killed” politically and
accused Australia of seeking to export the “next Boston bombers.” The president had recently issued an executive order temporarily
barring the admissions of refugees. To account for the Australia deal, a
special provision in the order allows for exceptions to honour “a
preexisting international agreement”. Mr Trump vented his anger over the deal on Twitter
on Wednesday night and called into doubt whether he would honour the
agreement. "Do you believe it? The Obama Administration agreed to take
thousands of illegal immigrants from Australia. Why? I will study this
dumb deal!," he said.
Australia
is one of America’s staunchest allies. They share intelligence and have
fought together in a number of wars, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mr Turnbull refused to comment on reports of the conversation. The
prime minister said conversations with world leaders are conducted
"candidly, frankly, privately", but stressed Australia's solid
relationship with the US was still in place. "I can assure you the relationship is very strong," he said. Mr Turnbull remained confident the resettlement deal of the refugees
would continue. Many of the refugees come Iran, Iraq, Sudan and Somalia,
countries that are listed in Mr Trump's travel ban. “I don’t want these people,” Mr Trump reportedly said, telling Mr
Turnbull it was “my intention” to honour the agreement. A senior US
official said the phrase was designed to give the president a way to
back out of the deal in the future, the newspaper said.
Show more
A government official said the president's dealings with other countries were "naive". "He keeps suggesting we will have the best relationship ever with a
broad departure of countries, but there is no substance to back it up,"
the official told CNN. "When he encounters a policy challenge like with
Turnbull, he responds with a tantrum." Bill Shorten, the opposition leader, called on Mr Turnbull to be open
about his interaction with Mr Trump, saying The Washington Post version
of the call was worrying. "We shouldn't be finding out about what's happening to Australian
policy through the news of foreign countries," Mr Shorten said. The wrangling with Australia comes days after Mr Trump sparked a
diplomatic crisis with Mexico for ordering the construction of a border
wall, prompting President Enrique Peña Nieto to cancel a scheduled visit to the White House.
Mr
Turnbull has resisted pressure this week to join other Western leaders
in condemning Trump's temporary ban of immigrants from seven
Muslim-majority countries. "When I have frank advice to give to an American president, I give it
privately, as good friends should, as wise prime ministers do when they
want to ensure they are best able to protect Australians and
Australia's national interest," Mr Turnbull told reporters on Tuesday. Some observers suspect Mr Turnbull has held his tongue because he is
grateful to Mr Trump for agreeing to honour the refugee deal. The Australian prime minister has made efforts to maintain strong
ties the new US administration and after Mr Trump's inauguration, Mr
Turnbull tweeted: "Congratulations President Trump @POTUS We are
steadfast allies & trusted friends with a great future ahead of us.
We wish you every success."
Donald Trump 'threatened to send US troops' across border to stop 'bad hombres' in call with Mexican president
Donald Trump threatened to send US troops to Mexico to deal with "bad hombres down there" in a call with President Enrique Peña Nieto, according to a partial transcript of the call seen by the Associated Press. Mr Trump used similar rhetoric while campaigning for the presidency,
but such a warning in a call with an allied world leader would mark an
extraordinary departure from decorum, in addition to the obvious
violation of Mexico's sovereignty that enforcing it would entail.
The phone
call between the leaders was intended to patch things up between the
new president and his ally. The two have had a series of public spats
over Mr Trump's determination to have Mexico pay for the planned border
wall, something Mexico steadfastly refuses to agree to. "You have a bunch of bad hombres down there," Mr Trump told Mr Pena
Nieto, according to the excerpt seen by the AP. "You aren't doing enough
to stop them. I think your military is scared. Our military isn't, so I
just might send them down to take care of it." The White House and the Mexican foreign ministry both denied that Mr Trump made the threat.
Trump 'to focus counter-extremism programme solely on Islam'
The Trump administration wants to revamp and rename a US government
programme designed to counter all violent ideologies so that it focuses
solely on Islamist extremism, five people briefed on the matter told
Reuters. The programme, "Countering Violent Extremism," or CVE, would be
changed to "Countering Islamic Extremism" or "Countering Radical Islamic
Extremism," the sources said, and would no longer target groups such as
white supremacists who have also carried out bombings and shootings in
the United States.
Such a
change would reflect Mr Trump's election campaign rhetoric and criticism
of former President Barack Obama for being weak in the fight against
Islamic State and for refusing to use the phrase "radical Islam" in
describing it. Islamic State has claimed responsibility for attacks on
civilians in several countries.
US Senate narrowly confirms Rex Tillerson as secretary of state
The US Senate narrowly confirmed Rex Tillerson to serve as secretary of state on Wednesday, meaning the former ExxonMobil CEO will now be at the forefront of US foreign policy. Democrats and Republicans have been doing battle in the Senate over
Mr Trump's other cabinet nominees and his pick for the US Supreme Court. The vote on Mr Tillerson was largely on party lines, with all 52
Republicans voting in favour, along with three Democrats and one
independent. It was not immediately clear when Mr Tillerson would be
sworn in and formally take over at the State Department.
Under any
circumstance, Mr Tillerson would have inherited a messy globe with a
civil war in Syria, nuclear-armed North Korea threatening to test an
intercontinental ballistic missile and challenges from a rising China
and an assertive Russia. In the 12 days since Mr Trump's inauguration, however, the White
House has taken steps that foreign policy professionals view as
self-inflicted wounds.
US puts Iran 'on notice' after missile test
The White House issued a cryptic
warning on Wednesday that the US will act against Iran unless it stops
testing ballistic missiles and supporting Houthi rebels in Yemen, but
declined to say what retaliatory actions the US would pursue. Michael Flynn, President Donald Trump's national security adviser,
forcefully denounced Iran's behavior in his first public remarks since
Mr Trump took office. He accused Iran of threatening US allies and
spreading instability throughout the Middle East while faulting the
Obama administration for doing too little to stop the Islamic Republic.
"As of today, we are officially putting Iran on notice," Mr Flynn said from the White House podium. On notice for what, Mr Flynn
didn't say. Senior Trump administration officials said they were
actively considering a "range of options" including economic measures
and increased support for Iran's regional adversaries. The officials,
who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, declined repeatedly to
say whether military action was being considered.
More Americans support Donald Trump's immigration ban than oppose it, poll shows
New polling suggests that Mr Trump's executive order to impose a
temporary block on immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries has
the support of nearly one in two Americans, Patrick Scott reports.
When
asked "do you agree or disagree with the executive order that President
Trump signed blocking refugees and banning people from seven Muslim
majority countries from entering the U.S.?", 49 per cent of respondents
said they agreed with the policy.
Tweets on Iran, Australia, and Paris Louvre attack
In a blitz of Twitter activity early Friday morning,
President Trump addressed Iran’s ballistic missile test, praised
Australia’s prime minister, and discussed the machete attack that
occurred in Paris’ Louvre museum.
America’s business leaders at White House
Trump
meets with his Strategic and Policy forum -- big business names,
including Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman, JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon,
Mary Barra of GM, Tesla’s Elon Musk, Bob Iger of Disney, among others.
Travis Kalanick resigned from the group Thursday.
The Cabinet
Very
early Friday morning, senators took a procedural vote on Betsy DeVos to
be education secretary. The Senate advanced DeVos’ nomination on a
procedural vote, 52 yeas to 48 nays -- a straight party line vote.The
Senate will continue debating the nomination with a final confirmation
vote on DeVos expected by the full Senate early next week, possibly as
early as Tuesday February 7. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch continues to visit with the senators who will decide on whether to confirm him. What
will Senate Democrats do about Neil Gorsuch? Which Democratic senators
will vote for him? Against him? When President Trump announced his Supreme Court pick as Judge Neil Gorsuch, Senate Democrats pounced. Senate
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer immediately fired off a statement that
Gorsuch, a consevative Denver-based judge who currently sits on the 10th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, would face an “exhaustive, robust, and
comprehensive debate” on his fitness to be a Supreme Court justice. Others,
like Oregon’s Jeff Merkley, charged that the seat on the Supreme Court
bench was “stolen” from former President Obama after Republicans refused
to confirm Judge Merrick Garland. Merkley vowed to do everything in his
power to “stand up against this assault on the court,” seeming to
threaten a filibuster of Mr. Trump’s nominee.
Executive action
Trump will also sign an executive order before he flies to Mar-a-Lago for the weekend
The Takeout podcast:
Will
Neil Gorsuch be the next David Souter? On this week’s show, Carrie
Severino, conservative activist and former clerk to Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas and conservative activist, and CBS News chief
legal correspondent Jan Crawford joined CBS News chief White House
correspondent Major Garrett and CBS News senior political editor Steve
Chaggaris to talk about why Republicans are confident President Trump
has found a bona fide conservative justice in Neil Gorsuch… and why
Gorsuch is no David Souter - a justice appointed by a Republican
president who ended up voting with liberals on the court.
CBS News poll on immigration ban and Supreme Court nominee
To be published at 7 a.m.
What you missed yesterday
How Trump ordered a covert raid in Yemen against al Qaeda
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick quits Trump’s economic advisory council
Uber co-founder and CEO Travis Kalanick has resigned from President Donald Trump’s economic advisory council in the wake of blistering criticism on social media of his participation on the White House panel of top business executives. Kalanick informed Uber’s employees of his decision in a memo published Thursday. “Earlier
today I spoke briefly with the President about the immigration
executive order and its issues for our community. I also let him know
that I would not be able to participate on his economic council,”
Kalanick’s memo stated.
The Seattle Times reports the Seattle-based department store chain said the decision was based on sales performance of the first daughter’s brand.
Prayer breakfast
At the National Prayer Breakfast Thursday, President Trump boasted of his television ratings during
his time hosting “The Apprentice” reality show and urged attendees to
“pray” for his successor, former California governor and Hollywood macho
man Arnold Schwarzenegger. “They hired a big, big movie star,
Arnold Schwarzenegger, to take my place,” said Mr. Trump, who still has
an executive producer credit on the “Celebrity Apprentice.” “And we know
how that turned out. The ratings went right down the tubes.”
Lawmakers respond to reports of Trump’s call with Australian PM
President Donald Trump issued a social media threat early Thursday to federal funds allocated to the University of California-Berkeley in the aftermath of a riot that forced the cancellation of a speech by polarizing Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos.
Russia sanctions
The Trump administration appeared to loosen U.S. sanctions Thursday that the Obama administration had imposed against Russia in response to its cyberattacks in the 2016 presidential election. The Treasury Department published a license that
authorizes certain transactions between U.S. companies and the FSB,
Russia’s security service and for the importation, distribution or use
of “certain information technology products in the Russian Federation.”
Such transactions had been prohibited under Obama administration
sanctions imposed on Russia in late December. At the time, the U.S.
sanctioned nine entities and individuals including the FSB and GRU. The
Obama administration said that the FSB had assisted and provided
material support to the GRU in its efforts to interfere with the U.S.
election.
Homeland Security IG will review immigration ban implementation
New guidance for travel ban exempts green card holders
After
days of confusion over how President Trump’s controversial immigration
order would be applied to legal permanent residents of the United
States, the White House says it has issued a new guidance that exempts green card holders from the travel ban. “They
no longer need a waiver because if they are a legal permanent resident,
they won’t need it anymore,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer
said at a news briefing Wednesday.
Meetings
The
president meets with Sen. Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch and
top Democrat Ron Wyden, also with House Ways and Means Chair Kevin Brady
and ranking member Richard Neal, 11:15 a.m. He also met with Harley-Davidson executives for lunch.
The cabinet
The nominations of two of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet picks --
Scott Pruitt for the Environmental Protection Agency and Mick Mulvaney
for the Office of Management and Budget -- will advance to a vote by the
full Senate after committee votes held Thursday. A day after
delaying its vote because of Senate Democrats’ boycott, the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee voted -- still with no Democrats
present -- to send Pruitt’s nomination to the full Senate. Pruitt’s
nomination advanced with 11 votes (all Republicans) to zero after GOP
members of the committee changed the rules to allow for a vote without
Democrats present And Mulvaney’s nomination will also go to the
full Senate, though the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs
Committee voted 8-7, along party lines, to send the nomination without a
recommendation.
WASHINGTON
— A federal judge in Brooklyn came to the aid of scores of refugees and
others who were trapped at airports across the United States on
Saturday after an executive order signed by President Trump, which
sought to keep many foreigners from entering the country, led to chaotic
scenes across the globe.
The
judge’s ruling blocked part of the president’s actions, preventing the
government from deporting some arrivals who found themselves ensnared by
the presidential order. But it stopped short of letting them into the
country or issuing a broader ruling on the constitutionality of Mr.
Trump’s actions.
The
high-stakes legal case played out on Saturday amid global turmoil, as
the executive order signed by the president slammed shut the borders of
the United States for an Iranian scientist headed to a lab in
Massachusetts, a Syrian refugee family headed to a new life in Ohio and
countless others across the world.
The
president’s order, enacted with the stroke of a pen at 4:42 p.m.
Friday, suspended entry of all refugees to the United States for 120
days, barred Syrian refugees indefinitely, and blocked entry into the
United States for 90 days for citizens of seven predominantly Muslim
countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
The
Department of Homeland Security said that the order also barred green
card holders from those countries from re-entering the United States. In
a briefing for reporters, White House officials said that green card
holders from the seven affected countries who are outside the United
States would need a case-by-case waiver to return.
Mr.
Trump — in office just a week — found himself accused of constitutional
and legal overreach by two Iraqi immigrants, defended by the American
Civil Liberties Union. Meanwhile, large crowds of protesters turned out
at airports around the country to denounce Mr. Trump’s ban on the entry
of refugees and people from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
Lawyers
who sued the government to block the White House order said the judge’s
decision could affect an estimated 100 to 200 people who were detained
upon arrival at American airports.
Judge
Ann M. Donnelly of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, who was
nominated by former President Barack Obama, ruled just before 9 p.m.
that implementing Mr. Trump’s order by sending the travelers home could
cause them “irreparable harm.” She said the government was “enjoined and
restrained from, in any manner and by any means, removing individuals”
who had arrived in the United States with valid visas or refugee status.
The
ruling does not appear to force the administration to let in people
otherwise blocked by Mr. Trump’s order who have not yet traveled to the
United States.
The
judge’s one-page ruling came swiftly after lawyers for the A.C.L.U.
testified in her courtroom that one of the people detained at an airport
was being put on a plane to be deported back to Syria at that very
moment. A government lawyer, Gisela A. Westwater, who spoke to the court
by phone from Washington, said she simply did not know.
Hundreds
of people waited outside of the courthouse chanting, “Set them free!”
as lawyers made their case. When the crowd learned that Judge Donnelly
had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, a rousing cheer went up in the
crowd.
Minutes
after the judge’s ruling in New York City, another judge, Leonie M.
Brinkema of Federal District Court in Virginia, issued a temporary
restraining order for a week to block the removal of any green card
holders being detained at Dulles International Airport.
In
a statement released early Sunday morning, the Department of Homeland
Security said it would continue to enforce all of the president’s
executive orders, even while complying with judicial decisions.
“Prohibited travel will remain prohibited,” the department said in a
statement, adding that the directive was “a first step towards
re-establishing control over America’s borders and national security.”
Around
the nation, security personnel at major international airports had new
rules to follow, though the application of the order appeared chaotic
and uneven. Humanitarian organizations delivered the bad news to
overseas families that had overcome the bureaucratic hurdles previously
in place and were set to travel. And refugees already on flights when
the order was signed on Friday found themselves detained upon arrival.
“We’ve
gotten reports of people being detained all over the country,” said
Becca Heller, the director of the International Refugee Assistance
Project. “They’re literally pouring in by the minute.”
Hameed Khalid Darweesh, center, after being released from detention at Kennedy Airport on Saturday.Credit
Victor J. Blue for The New York Times
Earlier
in the day, at the White House, Mr. Trump shrugged off the sense of
anxiety and disarray, suggesting that there had been an orderly rollout.
“It’s not a Muslim ban, but we were totally prepared,” he said. “It’s
working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all
over.”
But to many, the government hardly seemed prepared for the upheaval that Mr. Trump’s actions put into motion.
There
were numerous reports of students attending American universities who
were blocked from returning to the United States from visits abroad. One
student said in a Twitter post that he would be unable to study at
Yale. Another who attends the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was
refused permission to board a plane. A Sudanese graduate student at
Stanford University was blocked for hours from entering the country.
Human
rights groups reported that legal permanent residents of the United
States who hold green cards were being stopped in foreign airports as
they sought to return from funerals, vacations or study abroad. There
was widespread condemnation of the order, from religious leaders,
business executives, academics, political leaders and others. Mr.
Trump’s supporters offered praise, calling it a necessary step on behalf
of the nation’s security.
Homeland
Security officials said on Saturday night that 109 people who were
already in transit to the United States when the order was signed were
denied access; 173 were stopped before boarding planes heading to
America. Eighty-one people who were stopped were eventually given
waivers to enter the United States, officials said.
Legal
residents who have a green card and are currently in the United States
should meet with a consular officer before leaving the country, a White
House official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told reporters.
Officials did not clarify the criteria that would qualify someone for a
waiver, other than that it would be granted “in the national interest.”
But
the week-old administration appeared to be implementing the order
chaotically, with agencies and officials around the globe interpreting
it in different ways.
The Stanford student, Nisrin Omer, a legal permanent resident, said she was held at Kennedy International Airport
in New York for about five hours but was eventually allowed to leave
the airport. Others who were detained appeared to be still in custody or
sent back to their home countries.
White
House aides claimed on Saturday that there had been consultations with
State Department and homeland security officials about carrying out the
order. “Everyone who needed to know was informed,” one aide said.
But
that assertion was denied by multiple officials with knowledge of the
interactions, including two officials at the State Department. Leaders
of Customs and Border Protection
and of Citizenship and Immigration Services — the two agencies most
directly affected by the order — were on a telephone briefing on the new
policy even as Mr. Trump signed it on Friday, two officials said.
Protesters gathered at Dulles International Airport outside Washington.Credit
Paul J. Richards/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
The
A.C.L.U.’s legal case began with two Iraqis detained at Kennedy
Airport, the named plaintiffs in the case. One was en route to reunite
with his wife and son in Texas. The other had served alongside Americans
in Iraq for a decade.
Shortly
after noon on Saturday, Hameed Khalid Darweesh, an interpreter who
worked for more than a decade on behalf of the United States government
in Iraq, was released. After nearly 19 hours of detention, Mr. Darweesh
began to cry as he spoke to reporters, putting his hands behind his back
and miming handcuffs.
“What I do for this country? They put the cuffs on,” Mr. Darweesh said. “You know how many soldiers I touch by this hand?”
The
other man the lawyers are representing, Haider Sameer Abdulkhaleq
Alshawi, who was en route to Houston, was released Saturday night.
Before
the two men were released, one of the lawyers, Mark Doss, a supervising
attorney at the International Refugee Assistance Project, asked an
official, “Who is the person we need to talk to?”
Document: Virginia Ruling on
Trump Order
“Call Mr. Trump,” said the official, who declined to identify himself.
While
the judge’s ruling means that none of the detainees will be sent back
immediately, lawyers for the plaintiffs in the case expressed concern
that all those at the airports would now be put in detention, pending a
resolution of the case.
The
White House said the restrictions would protect “the United States from
foreign nationals entering from countries compromised by terrorism” and
allow the administration time to put in place “a more rigorous vetting
process.” But critics condemned Mr. Trump over the collateral damage on
people who had no sinister intentions in trying to come to the United
States.
Peaceful
protests began forming Saturday afternoon at Kennedy Airport, where
nine travelers had been detained upon arrival at Terminal 7 and two
others at Terminal 4, an airport official said. Similar scenes were
playing out at other airports across the nation.
An
official message to all American diplomatic posts around the world
provided instructions about how to treat people from the countries
affected: “Effective immediately, halt interviewing and cease issuance
and printing” of visas to the United States.
Internationally,
confusion turned to panic as travelers found themselves unable to board
flights bound for the United States. In Dubai and Istanbul, airport and
immigration officials turned passengers away at boarding gates and, in
at least one case, ejected a family from a flight it had boarded.
Breaking News Alerts
Sign up to receive an email from The New York Times as soon as important news breaks around the world.
Seyed
Soheil Saeedi Saravi, a promising young Iranian scientist, had been
scheduled to travel in the coming days to Boston, where he had been
awarded a fellowship to study cardiovascular medicine at Harvard,
according to Thomas Michel, the professor who was to supervise the
research fellowship.
But Professor Michel said the visas for the student and his wife had been indefinitely suspended.
“This
outstanding young scientist has enormous potential to make
contributions that will improve our understanding of heart disease, and
he has already been thoroughly vetted,” Professor Michel wrote to The
New York Times.
“Everyone
is just so heartbroken, so angry, so sad,” said Danielle Drake, the
community manager for US Together, an agency that resettles refugees.
A
Christian family of six from Syria said in an email to Representative
Charlie Dent, Republican of Pennsylvania, that they were being detained
on Saturday morning at Philadelphia International Airport despite having
legal paperwork, green cards and visas that had been approved.
In
the case of the two Iraqis held at Kennedy Airport, the legal filings
by his lawyers say that Mr. Darweesh was granted a special immigrant
visa on Jan. 20, the same day Mr. Trump was sworn in as president.
A
husband and father of three, Mr. Darweesh arrived at Kennedy Airport
with his family. Mr. Darweesh’s wife and children made it through
passport control and customs, but agents of Customs and Border
Protection detained him.
In
Istanbul, during a stopover on Saturday, passengers reported that
security officers had entered a plane after everyone had boarded and
ordered a young Iranian woman and her family to leave the aircraft.
Iranian
green card holders who live in the United States were blindsided by the
decree while on vacation in Iran, finding themselves in a legal limbo
and unsure whether they would be able to return to America.
“How
do I get back home now?” said Daria Zeynalia, a green card holder who
was visiting family in Iran. He had rented a house and leased a car, and
would be eligible for citizenship in November. “What about my job? If I
can’t go back soon, I’ll lose everything.”
Standing Rock may be the first battle site in Trump’s war on the environment
The fledgling Trump administration has effectively declared war on environmental protection. On Tuesday, President Trump signed executive orders that took the first steps toward reversing two Obama administration rulings against oil pipeline projects. One of those rulings, by the State Department, rejected the application for the Keystone XL pipeline
that would carry oil from the tar sands of Alberta to refineries and
shipping points in the United States. The other ruling, from the Army
Corps of Engineers, told owners of the Dakota Access pipeline to come up with alternative routes that would not endanger the water supply of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe in North Dakota.
Trump’s orders, in themselves, did not completely undo the
Obama administration’s pipeline decisions, but they are clear
indicators that such an outcome is in the works. TransCanada, the
Keystone project’s owner, is being asked to resubmit the project
application (with the caveat that Trump wants the pipeline built with
100% American steel). Meanwhile, the Army Corps of Engineers is being
ordered to “review and approve in an expedited manner” the North Dakota
pipeline plan of Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners. As
those two actions made headlines, more reports surfaced about the
administration’s Putin-like attempts to muzzle anyone in any government
agency who has views on the environment that are out of step with the
new regime. Even with best-friend-of-the-oil-industry Scott Pruitt not yet confirmed by the Senate as head of the Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA employees are feeling the cold hand of the Trump White House
covering their mouths. Grants and contracts worth $4 billion that
support environmental programs for states, tribes and other entities
have been put on hold. EPA employees, as well as scientists, researchers
and government workers in other departments who deal with environmental
issues — particularly climate change — have been told to make no public
statements, put no new content on websites, stay away from social media
and submit for review any speaking engagements or contacts with the
news media.When an unidentified person at the Badlands
National Park was found to be defiantly tweeting facts about climate
change, the posts were quickly removed by enforcers of the ban.Since
Trump’s election, scientists have been scrambling to copy vital climate
research onto private servers before the climate change deniers who
dominate policy in the new administration can do anything to harm the
data. “Something that seemed a little paranoid to me before all of a
sudden seems potentially realistic, or at least something you’d want to
hedge against,” UC Davis environmental researcher Nick Santos told the
Washington Post. “Doing this can only be a good thing. Hopefully they
leave everything in place. But if not, we’re planning for that.”Trump has been in office less than a week and he
is already confirming the worst fears of environmentalists. An
overwhelming number of scientific studies indicate that man-made climate
change will be an existential threat to humanity if no action is taken
to sharply reduce reliance on fossil fuels. President Obama believed the
science; Donald Trump and the people he has put in charge of energy and
environmental policies do not. It appears obvious that the Trump
administration will consistently favor oil, gas and coal interests over
citizens who just want clean air and water and a landscape that is not
carpeted with drilling rigs and fracking equipment.Last
weekend’s huge women’s marches in cities across the country pulled
together people with a variety of concerns, but environmental issues got
slight attention. That needs to change because the environment is the
one thing we all have in common.The first place where
the environmental battle lines are drawn will very likely be the
Standing Rock reservation. Through the summer, fall and into the snow
and freezing temperatures of winter, the tribe led anti-pipeline
protests that grew dramatically in size and drew international attention
to what had been an obscure project. Protesters thought they had won,
but now, with a stroke of Trump’s pen, victory has been snatched away.
The tribe will take the fight to the courts, but it seems inevitable
that there will be another physical confrontation as well. Thousands of
people will gather to resist, this time with the weather on their side,
the federal government against them and the future in their hands.The war is on.David.Horsey@latimes.comFollow me at @davidhorsey on TwitterMORE FROM TOP OF THE TICKET Trump’s 'America first' policy has a big fan in the Kremlin Surviving four years of Trump's huge ego and incurious mind Barack Obama built a new kind of Camelot for a new generation
Trump claims torture works but experts warn of its 'potentially existential' costs
Trump gives first presidential TV interview as draft executive order points to return to practices such as waterboarding
Donald Trump
has used his first TV interview as president to say he believes torture
“absolutely” works and that the US should “fight fire with fire.” Speaking to ABC News, Trump said he would defer to the defence
secretary, James Mattis, and CIA director, Mike Pompeo, to determine
what can and cannot be done legally to combat the spread of terrorism. But asked about the efficacy of tactics such as waterboarding, Trump said: “absolutely I feel it works.”
“When Isis is doing things that nobody has ever heard of since
medieval times. Would I feel strongly about waterboarding. As far as I’m
concerned we have to fight fire with fire.”Trump said he asked intelligence chiefs earlier this week whether torture works. “The answer was yes, absolutely,” he said.He added that terrorist groups “chop off the citizens’ or anybody’s
heads in the Middle East, because they’re Christian or Muslim or
anything else ... we have that and we’re not allowed to do anything.
We’re not playing on an even field.”The interviews come after reports that Trump is preparing to sign an
executive order that would reinstate the detention of terrorism suspects
at facilities known as “black sites”. This would remove limitations on coercive interrogation techniques
set by a longstanding army field manual intended to ensure humane
military interrogations, which is mostly compliant with the Geneva
Conventions. Mattis and Pompeo were “blindsided” by reports of the draft
order, Politico said citing sources.However, Trump faces resistance to the prospect of the reintroduction of torture.On Wednesday, Steve Kleinman, a retired air force colonel and senior
adviser to the FBI-led team that interrogates terrorist suspects warned
that weakening US prohibitions against torture was dangerous and
ignorant.“A lot of these people who weigh in heavily on interrogation have no
idea how little they know, [and do so] because of what they see on
television,” said Kleinman, chairman of the research advisory committee
to the High Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG).“There is, at best, anecdotal evidence to support torture,” said Kleinman, who emphasized that he was not speaking for the HIG.“There is, on the other hand, a robust body of scientific
literature and field testing that demonstrates the efficacy of a
relationship-based, rapport-based, cognitive-based approach to
interrogation, as well as a robust literature that would suggest torture
immediately undermines a source’s ability to be a reliable reporter of
information: memory is undermined, judgment is undermined,
decision-making is undermined, time-references are undermined. And this
is only from a purely operational perspective; we can’t take the
morality out of strategy.”“If the US was to make it once again the policy of the country to
coerce, and to detain at length in an extrajudicial fashion, the costs
would be beyond substantial – they’d be potentially existential,”
Kleinman said.Senator John McCain, a torture survivor and co-author of a 2015 law
barring the US security agencies from using interrogation techniques
that surpass the prohibitions beyond those set out in the US army field
manual, signalled his defiance.“The president can sign whatever executive orders he likes. But the
law is the law. We are not bringing back torture in the United States of
America,” said McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate
armed services committee.McCain referenced explicit guarantees from Pompeo and Mattis during their Senate confirmation proceedings to
follow the interrogations law and the army field manual. “I am
confident these leaders will be true to their word,” McCain said.The former CIA head Leon Panetta, who gave the orders to close the
agency’s black sites told the BBC that it would be a “mistake” to
reintroduce enhanced interrogation techniques and “damaging” to the
reputation of the US. Panetta said torture was violation of the US values and the constitution.Mark Fallon, who was the deputy chief of Guantánamo’s Bush-era
investigative taskforce for military tribunals, said: “It does appear
like a subterfuge to enact more brutal methods because that was what
candidate Trump campaigned on during the election.”Fallon warned that the field manual’s appendix M, which allows
extended “separation” of a detainee from other captives, represented a
“slippery slope that could bring back torture”.Britain’s prime minister, Theresa May, has been urged to by her own MPs to make Britain’s opposition to torture clear to Trump when she visits him on Friday.At prime minister’s questions Andrew Tyrie, a senior Tory MP, said:
“President Trump has repeatedly said he will bring back torture as an
instrument of policy. When she sees him on Friday, will the prime
minister make it clear that in no circumstances will she permit Britain
to be dragged into facilitating that torture, as we were after 11
September?”
Since you’re here…
…we
have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than
ever but far fewer are paying for it. And advertising revenues across
the media are falling fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your
help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot
of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe
our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective,
too.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.
A new president, a new predator and a liberal island is worried about its way of life
William Yardley
Shortly after Donald Trump
accepted the Republican nomination for president last summer, a cougar
swam across a salt-water channel to this island oasis amid Seattle and
its suburbs. At the time, many people here viewed the
candidate and the big cat as interlopers, soon to be exposed and
expelled. But both are still around — and one is clearly causing more
concern than the other on this increasingly anxious island. “If we could have the cougar or Trump for the next four
years, I’d take the cougar,” said Tristan Dornall, 27, who has not
ventured alone into the woods near his house since he had a startlingly
close encounter with the animal there in November. “I mean, definitely.” If
Seattle is the predictably Democratic capital of the Pacific Northwest,
Vashon, just 20 minutes away by ferry, is one of the region’s
experimental laboratories, a place where new strains of environmentalism
and progressivism flourish, unencumbered by mainland reality. It
presents an increasingly rare constituency: rural but not red.
Country roads curve through art galleries, alpaca
farms and sustainable distilleries. A nonprofit’s popular “rewilding”
program teaches families “our renowned approach to deep nature
connection and the bundle of teachings we call Coyote Mentoring.”Of the 7,701 people here who cast ballots for president in November, fewer than 13% voted for Trump, and nearly 78% backed Hillary Clinton.Now,
as the Trump era unfolds, Vashon is confronting what many parts of
liberal America feel, an uncomfortable blend of realization,
determination and fear. And this being an island — a bubble, yes,
islanders know that — there is also a temptation to retrench, to shrink
the world to the immediate shoreline.“I tend to be very
globally minded, and I think my processing right now is to think more
locally,” said April Sherman, whose great-great-grandfather homesteaded
here in the 1870s. “I feel a little out of control, like I can’t do
much.”Some Vashon residents say they want to reach out,
to bridge the cultural and economic divisions Trump’s campaign helped
reveal. Many also express resolve to fight harder than ever to protect
the planet and their unique piece of it.“Since the
advent of environmental laws, I think there is more gravely at risk now
than ever before,” said Amy Carey, whose fight to stop a gravel mine
from being dug here more than a decade ago led her to found Sound
Action, an assertive nonprofit that works to protect nearshore areas all
over Puget Sound. “And we have no gimme room for error.”A
couple of years ago, stories shot across the Internet declaring Vashon
the most liberal place in the United States based on an analysis of
political donations. Not long after, that analysis was debunked by an
island newspaper, which concluded that, using the same measure, Vashon
was merely more liberal than Seattle. Other skeptics have questioned
what liberalism really looks like in a wealthy enclave where more
than 90% of its 10,600 residents are white.Islanders,
ever self-aware, are trying to answer the question themselves. They have
been working to finalize a new zoning plan that aspires to a
challenging progressive balance — increase the amount of affordable
housing without compromising their rural way of life or giving too much
freedom to developers they do not trust.One idea is to
create a nonprofit that would build only as much housing as island
workers need and in a way that puts the environment first.“I
know we are grieving with the results of the national election,” Martin
Baker, a longtime resident and environmental activist, wrote to
concerned residents last fall. “I suggest this is a place to take
action. It is, after all, our home.”That word, “home,”
resonates deeply here. Cashiers in the grocery store pick up
conversations with customers from the last time they came in. Baristas
anticipate orders. Not only do people leave their cars unlocked, some
leave the keys on the seat. The novelist Michael Chabon
once lived on Vashon and has said it helped inspire the setting of his
2002 book, “Summerland.” In the book, the fictional Clam Island was
connected to the mainland until a bridge collapsed. It did not take long
for islanders to view their new isolation as a good thing. Vashon never
had a bridge, but its residents, like those in the book, are content to
come and go by ferries, which run frequently from two terminals on the
island. “You could not get a cup of coffee or clam
chowder, or hear all about your neighbor’s sick cousin or chicken, on
the Clam Narrows Bridge,” Chabon wrote, adding, “Islands have always
been strange and magical places. Crossing the water to reach them ought
to be, even in a small way, an adventure.” As
for Trump, some here are trying to take a long view — hoping that
his election is an aberration, a difficult but not insurmountable
hurdle in the march toward a more progressive era.Many
residents note that the West Coast voted overwhelmingly Democratic (some
big cities and counties voted more decisively for Clinton than Vashon
did). They emphasize that Clinton won nearly 3 million more votes nationwide (suggesting
they may not be in such a bubble after all), and they point out that
Trump is viewed with suspicion even among many in his own party (another
reason, they hope, he might not win a second term).“You
have to empathize with and understand those people,” Derek Churchill,
who teaches sustainable forestry practices on Vashon but also
in conservative timber towns, said of Trump voters in rural areas. “A
lot of these folks are so desperate.“They live in places
where schools are closing, where there are meth addiction problems,
these communities that are slowly spiraling downward. That is something
we need to figure out how to address. That’s got to be a wake-up call.”Bianca
Perla, who grew up on the island, earned a doctorate in ecology at the
University of Washington and now runs the Vashon Nature Center, said
that, although she fears a Trump administration, it may not be a bad
thing that his election pierced what she called Vashon’s “bubble
mentality.”“Now we see more widely,” Perla said. “Our
island, the nice thing about it is we can be sort of insular and have
this beauty all around us. But the cold reality is that it’s affected by
larger systems. It’s all connected.”That dynamic, in fact, is what prompted the cougar to make his big swim last summer.
Sergeant Kim Chandler of the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife said the cougar likely was seeking a bubble of its own — a
place with lush forests and abundant prey, a refuge from the
increasingly developed region beyond Vashon. Now, however, after the
cougar has been linked to at least four alpaca deaths, the state is
trying to trap it. If the state succeeds, the animal may be outfitted
with a GPS collar and released in the Cascade Range. “If
you picked that island up and plopped it down somewhere near the
mountains,” Chandler said, “it’d be exactly the same habitat.”
The Senate Democrats' sound and fury over
President Donald Trump's cabinet picks and his political agenda is
apparently signifying nothing – at least on defense policy. The fact
that the Senate quickly confirmed General James "Mad Dog" Mattis by a
vote of 98-1
late Friday afternoon in the wake of inauguration activities shows that
even progressive Democrats, such as Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth
Warren, don't have the stomach for a foreign policy fight with Trump's
new Pentagon. That's how effectively Trump and perhaps even Mattis'
defense industry connections are already bullying Washington into submission.
Sanders justified his vote by saying
that while Mattis wasn't the nominee he preferred, "in a Trump cabinet
likely to be loaded up with right-wing extremists, all of whom I will
oppose, I hope General Mattis will have a moderating influence on some
of the racist and xenophobic views that President Trump advocated
throughout the campaign." This is incredibly wishful and relativistic
thinking. Mattis will never be a moderating influence, and he's already
exhibited racist and xenophobic thinking by the ways in which he views
the adversary.
The Pentagon's new secretary of defense believes, and is on record
saying, that we should "have a plan to kill everybody you meet," that
"if you f*ck with me, I'll kill you all," and that "there are some
assholes in the world that just need to be shot".
Bombastic braggadocios aren't helpful at the
Pentagon helm. This language may serve a purpose within the defense
industry, as it props up their for-profit modus operandi. But in terms
of aiding international affairs, it's caustic and antagonistic and will
only get us into more wars, not fewer.
Mattis, moreover, thinks that shooting people is
"just business" and that it's "a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
This is exactly the kind of attitude that leads to U.S. Marines
urinating on dead Afghan bodies. When our new defense secretary says
that killing is "a hell of a hoot," and that "It's fun to shoot some
people," we are inculcating a culture of indiscriminate violence. This
is not level-headed and will undoubtedly lead to more trickle-down
killing and callousness.
This is also not emblematic of cooler heads
capable of prevailing amid the myriad precipitous, conflict-ridden
cliffs that we will invariably face in a Trump foreign policy agenda.
Yet, every single Democrat in the Senate – with the exception of New
York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand – voted to send that message to the world.
What a lost opportunity to send a different message.
What's most frustrating here, however, is that
this problem – of progressives rolling over to more militaristic foreign
policy players in Washington – is prevalent within the progressive
policy community. It's also what plagued Sanders' presidential campaign.
Many progressive policymakers don't have sufficient foreign policy
experience to competently push back when questioned about a violent
conflict overseas. They've largely not spent time in conflict zones
without military escort, which is part of the problem, of course, as
Pentagon protection offers an extremely selective and ultimately biased
perspective. Nor have they prioritized meetings with community-based
organizations in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Syria or
Pakistan, that are cleaning up after the death and destruction from our
drone strikes, airstrikes, ground raids and weapons trafficking.
General James Mattis will have the chance to practice what he preaches on nuclear weapons.
This is a serious and serial problem.
Progressive Democrats often get elected to Congress after years of local
and state service on legislatures, county and school boards, and
commissions, but arrive in Washington with little foreign service or
foreign policy expertise of any kind. They haven't seen for themselves –
and our mainstream media are rarely showing – the disastrous wake left
behind by our military invasions. And they often can't properly
pronounce a foreign or adversary's town, tribe, territory or tactic in a
debate, getting trounced by more militarily minded opponents.
This happens over and over and over again. And
it was very visible in debates between Sanders and Hillary Clinton. She
was clearly perceived as the security expert, even if it came with email
blunders, because she had exposure while at the State Department to the
language, the lexicon and the litany of defense apparatuses that are
useful to presidential debate.
It's high time progressives in Congress –
elected officials and their senior staff – get over to places like Bayda
province in Yemen, where the Trump administration's first drone strikes occurred over the weekend, Somalia's Galmudug region, where the U.S. killed
nearly two dozen government soldiers in September, and anywhere in
Afghanistan, where the U.S. under the Obama administration increased air
strikes by 40 percent
in 2016. And insist to see it with the assistance and collaboration of
local actors and international aid and relief organizations.
Then, progressive members of Congress might be
able to go toe-to-toe with the Mattises of this world. Until then,
progressives have no fighting chance on the foreign policy front.
Michael Shank teaches sustainable development at New York
University’s Center for Global Affairs and served as a senior policy
adviser to U.S. Rep. Michael Honda between 2009-2013.
Trump's 'day of patriotic devotion' has echoes of North KoreaJustin McCurry in Tokyo
Donald Trump has echoed North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un,
after declaring that the day of his inauguration should be a “national
day of patriotic devotion” – a rallying cry that would not be out of
place in the secretive state’s propaganda. Trump’s proclamation, which was made official on Monday,
has been uttered by Kim in speeches to his 1.2 million-strong military
and members of the ruling Korean Workers’ party in recent years.
In an address to a military parade in Pyongyang
on 10 October 2015 – the party’s 70th anniversary – Kim thanked the
“heroic men and women” of the army and security services who, “in hearty
response to the party’s appeal, have worked with patriotic devotion and
created one heroic miracle after another” in their quest to build a
“thriving socialist nation”.The phrase also crops up in North Korean propaganda.On 19 December last year, the fifth anniversary of the death of Kim’s father, Kim Jong-il,
the Rodong Sinmun, the ruling party’s official newspaper, said of the
late leader: “The noble image and patriotic devotion of the peerless
patriot, who reliably defended socialism centred on the popular masses
and turned [North Korea] into an invincible politico-ideological power
and a world military power.”In an article just after Kim’s death,
the official KCNA news agency cited meteorologists as saying “the
spring of prosperity under socialism will surely come … thanks to the
patriotic devotion of Kim Jong-il, who blocked the howling wind of
history till the last moments of his life”.And last January, the Rodong Sinmun cited a speech in which Kim
Jong-un had congratulated a socialist youth league formed in the name of
his grandfather and North Korea’s founder, Kim Il-sung, on its 70th anniversary.Kim, according to the paper, said the league had enjoyed “a history
of brilliant victories of the great leaders’ original idea of
prioritising the youth and their wise leadership and a history of ardent
loyalty and patriotic devotion, with which the young people of Korea
have supported the party and the leader, the country and the people”.Trump’s use of the term, and its provenance, was noted on Twitter.In his inaugural speech, Trump declared that he would put “America
first” and argued that patriotic zeal could heal the nation’s divisions.On Monday, paperwork was filed with the federal government declaring that the day of his inauguration, 20 January 2017, would be officially known as the “National Day of Patriotic Devotion”.Trump’s executive order said the proclamation would “strengthen our
bonds to each other and to our country – and to renew the duties of
government to the people”.Jiro Ishimaru of Asia Press,
an Osaka-based organisation with a network of high-level contacts in
North Korea, said that by invoking patriotic devotion, Trump appeared to
be channeling three generations of North Korea’s Kim dynasty.Trump’s inaugural speech in full“Ordinary North Koreans hear those words every day,” Ishimaru told
the Guardian. “They don’t just appear in the media and speeches, but on
posters and in other propaganda. They hear the word patriotism at local
residents’ meetings, where, for example, they’re told to produce more
rice out of love for their country, or to collect more scrap metal for
weapons and bullets.”It is not unusual for incoming US presidents to draw on their
political and philosophical beliefs when, as is customary, they give a
new name to inauguration day. Barack Obama called his first
inauguration, in 2009, a National Day of Renewal and Reconciliation;
eight years earlier, George W Bush began his first term by declaring the
date a National Day of Prayer and Thanksgiving.Ishimaru said most ordinary North Koreans were barely aware that the
US had a new president. The Rodong Sinmun reported the inauguration in a
brief article, without comment, at the bottom of the newspaper’s back
page on Sunday, two days after it took place.“I talk to North Koreans every day, and Trump’s inauguration has
barely registered with them,” he said. “Life is extremely tough, so they
are too busy concentrating on their own problems to think about US
politics.”
Since you’re here…
…we
have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than
ever but far fewer are paying for it. And advertising revenues across
the media are falling fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your
help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot
of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe
our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective,
too.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.
Protesters walk during the Women’s
March on Washington, with the U.S. Capitol in the background, on January
21, 2017 in Washington, D.C.
Mario Tama, Getty Images
Last Updated Jan 22, 2017 1:33 PM EST
President
Donald Trump, in between tweets about his “long standing ovations” at
CIA headquarters and his inauguration’s television ratings, implied in a
tweet early Sunday morning that the Women’s March protesters did not vote. “Watched
protests yesterday but was under the impression that we just had an
election!” Mr. Trump wrote. “Why didn’t these people vote? Celebs hurt
cause badly.”
However, shortly after posting that first tweet, he added that he respects Americans’ right to protest:top aide Kellyanne Conway defended Mr. Trump’s comments on the protests.
She denounced the “vulgar” comments from some at the Women’s
March on Washington, saying there was no need for such “negative”
comments. “You had profanity-laced, vulgar comments coming from
celebrities,” she said. “Donald Trump in his inaugural address talked
about the forgotten man, now these forgotten celebrities came to
Washington to deliver really negative messages.” The gender gap in the election
was large: Mr. Trump beat Clinton by 53 percent to 41 percent among
men, while Clinton won among women by 54 percent to 42 percent. The
gender breakdown among white voters was different, however: Mr. Trump
beat Clinton among white women 53 percent to 43 percent. The
Women’s March featured millions of protesters in cities across the
country rallying against President Trump’s stated agenda, with the
primary protest being a large rally in Washington, D.C. Many protesters
wore pointy-eared “pussyhats,” carried signs protesting various aspects
of the new administration’s plans, and chanted "Welcome to your first
day, we will never go away.”
Thanks a Million, dear Letizia Mancino. You are an outstanding writer and artist.
We are so proud and happy to have you with us.
Letizia writes: One should not underestimate Wolfgang Hampel’s talent in speedily mobilizing Betty MacDonald’s friends.
We agree. Thank you so much dear Wolfgang Hampel for doing this. You founded Betty MacDonald Fan Club with four members.
Now we have members in 40 countries around the world. A dream came true.
Mary Holmes did an excellent job in translating this great story. Thank you so much dear Mary Holmes. We are really very grateful.
All the best to Letizia, Wolfgang and Mary and to all Betty MacDonald Fan Club fans from all over the world!
Lenard
Following in Betty’s footsteps in Seattle:
or some small talk with Betty
Copyright 2011/2016 by Letizia Mancino All rights reserved translated by Mary Holmes
We
were going to Canada in the summer. “When we are in Edmonton”, I said
to Christoph Cremer, “let’s make a quick trip to Seattle”. And that’s
how it happened. At Edmonton Airport we climbed into a plane and two
hours later we landed in the city where Betty had lived. I was so happy
to be in Seattle at last and to be able to trace Betty’s tracks!
Wolfgang Hampel had told Betty’s friends about our arrival. They
were happy to plan a small marathon through the town and it’s
surroundings with us. We only had a few days free. One should not
underestimate Wolfgang’s talent in speedily mobilizing Betty’s friends,
even though it was holiday time. E-mails flew backwards and forwards
between Heidelberg and Seattle, and soon a well prepared itinerary was
ready for us. Shortly before my departure Wolfgang handed me several
parcels, presents for Betty MacDonald's friends. I rushed to pack the
heavy gifts in my luggage but because of the extra weight had to throw
out a pair of pajamas!
After we had landed we took a taxi to the
Hotel in downtown Seattle. I was so curious to see everything. I
turned my head in all directions like one of the hungry hens from
Betty’s farm searching for food! Fortunately it was quite a short
journey otherwise I would have lost my head like a loose screw! Our
hotel room was on the 22nd floor and looked directly out onto the
16-lane highway. There might have been even more than 16 but it made me
too giddy to count! It was like a glimpse of hell! “And is this
Seattle?” I asked myself. I was horrified! The cars racing by were
enough to drive one mad. The traffic roared by day and night. We
immediately contacted Betty MacDonald's friends and let them know we had
arrived and they confirmed the times when we should see them.
On
the next morning I planned my first excursion tracing Betty’s tracks. I
spread out the map of Seattle. “Oh dear” I realized “the Olympic
Peninsula is much too far away for me to get there.” Betty nodded to me! “Very difficult, Letizia, without a car.”
“But I so much wanted to see your chicken farm”
“My chickens are no longer there and you can admire the mountains from a distance”
But
I wanted to go there. I left the hotel and walked to the waterfront
where the State Ferry terminal is. Mamma mia, the streets in Seattle are
so steep! I couldn’t prevent my feet from running down the hill. Why
hadn’t I asked for brakes to be fixed on my shoes? I looked at the
drivers. How incredibly good they must be to accelerate away from the
red traffic lights. The people were walking uphill towards me as briskly
as agile salmon. Good heavens, these Americans! I tried to keep my
balance. The force of gravity is relentless. I grasped hold of objects
where I could and staggered down. In Canada a friend had warned me that in Seattle I would see a lot of people with crutches.
Betty laughed. “ It’s not surprising, Letizia, walking salmon don’t fall directly into the soft mouth of a bear!” “ Betty, stop making these gruesome remarks. We are not in Firlands!”
I
went further. Like a small deranged ant at the foot of a palace monster
I came to a tunnel. The noise was unbearable. On the motorway, “The
Alaskan Way Viaduct”, cars, busses and trucks were driving at the speed
of light right over my head. They puffed out their poisonous gas into
the open balconies and cultivated terraces of the luxurious sky-
scrapers without a thought in the world. America! You are crazy! “Betty,
are all people in Seattle deaf? Or is it perhaps a privilege for
wealthy people to be able to enjoy having cars so near to their eyes and
noses to save them from boredom?”
“When the fog democratically allows everything to disappear into nothing, it makes a bit of a change, Letizia”
“ Your irony is incorrigible, Betty, but tell me, Seattle is meant to be a beautiful city, But where?” I had at last reached the State Ferry terminal.
“No
Madam, the ferry for Vashon Island doesn’t start from here,” one of the
men in the ticket office tells me. ”Take a buss and go to the ferry
terminal in West Seattle.” Betty explained to me “The island lies in
Puget Sound and not in Elliott Bay! It is opposite the airport. You must
have seen it when you were landing!” “Betty, when I am landing I shut my eyes and pray!”
It’s time for lunch. The weather is beautiful and warm. Who said to me that it always rains here? “Sure
to be some envious man who wanted to frighten you away from coming to
Seattle. The city is really beautiful, you’ll see. Stay by the
waterfront, choose the best restaurant with a view of Elliott Bay and
enjoy it.” “Thank you Betty!” I find a table on the
terrace of “Elliott’s Oyster House”. The view of the island is
wonderful. It lies quietly in the sun like a green fleecy cushion on the
blue water. Betty plays with my words: “Vashon Island is a big
cushion, even bigger than Bainbridge which you see in front of your
eyes, Letizia. The islands look similar. They have well kept houses and
beautiful gardens”.
I relax during this introduction, “Bainbridge” you are Vashon Island, and order a mineral water.
“At one time the hotel belonging to the parents of Monica Sone stood on the waterfront.” “Oh, of your friend Kimi!” Unfortunately I forget to ask Betty exactly where it was.
My mind wanders and I think of my mountain hike back to the hotel! “Why is there no donkey for tourists?” Betty laughs:
“I’m sure you can walk back to the hotel. “Letizia can do everything.””
“Yes, Betty, I am my own donkey!” But
I don’t remember that San Francisco is so steep. It doesn’t matter, I
sit and wait. The waiter comes and brings me the menu. I almost fall off
my chair! “ What, you have geoduck on the menu! I have to try it” (I
confess I hate the look of geoduck meat. Betty’s recipe with the pieces
made me feel quite sick – I must try Betty’s favourite dish!) “Proof that you love me!” said Betty enthusiastically “ Isn’t the way to the heart through the stomach?”
I order the geoduck. The waiter looks at me. He would have liked to recommend oysters. “Geoduck no good for you!” Had he perhaps read my deepest thoughts? Fate! Then no geoduck. “No good for me.” “Neither geoduck nor tuberculosis in Seattle” whispered Betty in my ear! “Oh Betty, my best friend, you take such good care of me!”
I order salmon with salad.
“Which salmon? Those that swim in water or those that run through Seattle?”
“Betty, I believe you want me to have a taste of your black humour.”
“Enjoy it then, Letizia.” During lunch we talked about tuberculosis, and that quite spoilt our appetite. “Have you read my book “The Plague and I”?”
“Oh Betty, I’ve started to read it twice but both times I felt so sad I had to stop again!”
“But
why?” asked Betty “Nearly everybody has tuberculosis! I recovered very
quickly and put on 20 pounds! There was no talk of me wasting away! What
did you think of my jokes in the book?”
“Those would have been a
good reason for choosing another sanitorium. I would have been afraid
of becoming a victim of your humour! You would have certainly given me a
nickname! You always thought up such amusing names!” Betty laughed.
“You’re
right. I would have called you “Roman nose”. I would have said to Urbi
and Orbi “ Early this morning “Roman nose” was brought here. She speaks
broken English, doesn’t eat geoduck but she does love cats.”
“Oh
Betty, I would have felt so ashamed to cough. To cough in your presence,
how embarrassing! You would have talked about how I coughed, how many
coughs!”
“It depends on that “how”, Letizia!”
“Please,
leave Goethe quotations out of it. You have certainly learnt from the
Indians how to differentiate between noises. It’s incredible how you
can distinguish between so many sorts of cough! At least 10!”
“So few?”
”And
also your descriptions of the patients and the nurses were pitiless. An
artistic revenge! The smallest pimple on their face didn’t escape your
notice! Amazing.”
“ I was also pitiless to myself. Don’t forget my irony against myself!”
Betty
was silent. She was thinking about Kimi, the “Princess” from Japan! No,
she had only written good things about her best friend, Monica Sone, in
her book “The Plague and I”. A deep friendship had started in the
hospital. The pearl that developed from the illness. “Isn’t it
wonderful, Betty, that an unknown seed can make its way into a mollusk
in the sea and develop into a beautiful jewel?” Betty is paying
attention.
“Betty, the friendship between you and Monica reminds
me of Goethe’s poem “Gingo-Biloba”. You must know it?” Betty nods and I
begin to recite it:
The leaf of this Eastern tree Which has been entrusted to my garden Offers a feast of secret significance, For the edification of the initiate.
Is it one living thing. That has become divided within itself? Are these two who have chosen each other, So that we know them as one?
The
friendship with Monica is like the wonderful gingo-biloba leaf, the
tree from the east. Betty was touched. There was a deep feeling of trust
between us. “Our friendship never broke up, partly because she was
in distress, endangered by the deadly illness. We understood and
supplemented each other. We were like one lung with two lobes, one from
the east and one from the west!” “A beautiful picture, Betty. You were like two red gingo-biloba leaves!”
Betty
was sad and said ” Monica, although Japanese, before she really knew me
felt she was also an American. But she was interned in America,
Letizia, during the second world war. Isn’t that terrible?”
“Betty,
I never knew her personally. I have only seen her on a video, but what
dignity in her face, and she speaks and moves so gracefully!”
“Fate could not change her”
“Yes, Betty, like the gingo-biloba tree in Hiroshima. It was the only tree that blossomed again after the atom bomb!”
The
bill came and I paid at once. In America one is urged away from the
table when one has finished eating. If one wants to go on chatting one
has to order something else. “That’s why all those people gossiping
at the tables are so fat!” Betty remarks. “Haven’t you seen how many
massively obese people walk around in the streets of America. Like
dustbins that have never been emptied!” With this typically
unsentimental remark Betty ended our conversation.
Ciao! I so
enjoyed the talk; the humour, the irony and the empathy. I waved to her
and now I too felt like moving! I take a lovely walk along the
waterfront.
Now I am back in Heidelberg and when I think about
how Betty’s “Princessin” left this world on September 5th and that in
August I was speaking about her with Betty in Seattle I feel very sad.
The readers who knew her well (we feel that every author and hero of a
book is nearer to us than our fleeting neighbours next door) yes we, who
thought of her as immortal, cannot believe that even she would die
after 92 years. How unforeseen and unexpected that her death should come
four days after her birthday on September 1th. On September 5th I was
on my way to Turkey, once again in seventh heaven, looking back on the
unforgettable days in Seattle. I was flying from west to east towards
the rising sun.
Betty MacDonald Fan Club, founded by Wolfgang Hampel, has members in 40 countries.
Wolfgang Hampel, author of Betty MacDonald biography interviewed Betty MacDonald's family and friends. His Interviews have been published on CD and DVD by Betty MacDonald Fan Club. If you are interested in the Betty MacDonald Biography or the Betty MacDonald Interviews send us a mail, please.
Several original Interviews with Betty MacDonald are available.
We are also organizing international Betty MacDonald Fan Club Events for example, Betty MacDonald Fan Club Eurovision Song Contest Meetings in Oslo and Düsseldorf, Royal Wedding Betty MacDonald Fan Club Event in Stockholm and Betty MacDonald Fan Club Fifa Worldcup Conferences in South Africa and Germany.
Betty MacDonald Fan Club Honour Members are Monica Sone, author of Nisei Daughter and described as Kimi in Betty MacDonald's The Plague and I, Betty MacDonald's nephew, artist and writer Darsie Beck, Betty MacDonald fans and beloved authors and artists Gwen Grant, Letizia Mancino, Perry Woodfin, Traci Tyne Hilton, Tatjana Geßler, music producer Bernd Kunze, musician Thomas Bödigheimer, translater Mary Holmes and Mr. Tigerli.
